6 Far-famed Awards Way More Full Of S #!% Than You Conclude

The greatest achievement you can hope for after a lifetime of work in your particular field is perhaps a solid clap on the shoulder as security bodyguards you out the door. But, some people do triumph big, meaningful awards for their excellent reports — or so they would like you to think. In truism, many of the most prestigious awards are a cluster of bunk. Like …

# 6. The Golden Globes Are Probably Awarded Based On Bribes

The Golden Globe Awards are the poor man’s Oscars, but if you put your heart and soul into movie or Tv, you would probably preferably win one instead of two handful of shiny nothing. The bad news is that no matter how good “you think youre”, your qualification for a Golden Globe might come down to whether or not you can afford to buy the magistrates an expensive dinner.

If you’re on a fund, you are able ever simply buy yourself an MTV Movie Award .

For a recent example, in 2011, the Globes elected three awards apiece for both the utterly forgettable Johnny Depp/ Angelina Jolie cinema The Tourist and the movie-length Christina Aguilera book ad Burlesque ( 20 percentage and 34 percent on Rotten Tomatoes, respectively ). Critics of the apportions wonder whether this has anything to linked to the fact that Sony Pictures, the company behind both movies, paid to moved the Globes voters to Las Vegas and treated them to a indulgence hotel and a private Cher concert. Apparently, the treat was that she wouldn’t stop singing until Sony’s movies were granted the nominations.

But, the dishonesty behind the Golden Globes extends method back. In 1982, actress Pia Zadora won the Golden Globe for Best New Female Star for her concert in Butterfly . If you are familiar Butterfly for anything, it’s probably the fact that it swept the Golden Raspberry Awards that year, including Zadora herself for both Worst Actress and Worst New Star.

At least Zadora recovered from that embarrassment to star in a classic .

So, how did one of the most serious movies of 1982 are to be able to get a Golden Globe? Perhaps because Zadora’s husband, Israeli multimillionaire Meshulam Riklis, treated the voters to a darknes at the former Riviera Hotel And Casino, which he happened to own.

The gossips encircling the gifts have been so numerous that they’ve lost multiple broadcast bargains over its first year because of them. It shouldn’t passed as a huge bombshell that in 2011, the Golden Globes were sued by a former publicist of the Hollywood Foreign Press Association and accused of engaging in payola strategies for nominations and awards.

They were also sued by the general public for being a masturbatory squander of everyone’s day .

But, hey, we’re not saying that your Golden Globe is worthless. You could probably hang stuff on it or use it to prop open a door or something.

# 5. The Grammys Are Seen By A Secret, Anonymous Committee

Officially, the process behind Grammy nominations is pretty straightforward: Artists defer their work to be nominated, the Academy votes for the top five campaigners and then referendums again for the win. You know, the same way that most awards labour. Except that, in the case provided for of the Grammys, there’s an extra stair that you don’t often hear about — the evaluates receive the voting rights, crinkle them up, shed them into the incinerator, and then pick the campaigners they personally want.

There was also that awkward occasion when their request for more mackerel at the awards’ dinner get contacted wrong .

Since 1994, the Grammys have employed trade secrets body of adjudicates who have almost limitless ability to tweak the bestows in any way they see fit. The secrecy is ostensibly to eliminate the opportunities that they are able to bribed by the music manufacture, but it has the effect of creating a kind of music Illuminati whose sole discretion can see or interrupt luminary careers.

Legend has it that the committee was modelled in response to the greatest crisis in Grammy history — the opportunities that “Macarena” was in the running for the purposes of an award. Whether or not that’s true-life, it’s certainly a fact that the Grammys had been fighting for relevant for quite some time, due to the fact that the voting members were frequently out of contact with the public interest and stopped parcelling the nominations with granny pleasers like The Three Tenors and Tony Bennett, at the cost of more relevant artists.

And let’s not forget the time they elected Dinah Washington for Best New Artist in 2013.

The result is a group of people whose activity is to tweak the nominations if they stray extremely far from what the public might very well be attributed to. Tony Bennett might be an outstanding creator, but the Grammys lose ratings if the Academy deters gifting him over, say, the Baha Men, who won the gift in 2001 for that great contribution to the American songbook, “Who Told the Dogs Out.” Man, 2001 was just a bad time in all metrics.

# 4. Baseball Hall Of Fame Is Tainted By Racism And Favoritism

The Baseball Hall Of Fame was established in 1936, an honor granted by the Baseball Writers’ Association Of America. As you would expect, voters select their nominations based on a player’s ability to, you are familiar, play baseball. But, there’s another factor that comes into play. Voters are asked to consider the “character” of the player. What does that mean? Basically, anything you like — from their donation toil, to their willingness to buy the team drinkings after video games, to how pitch-black they aren’t.

“Fine … We predict … ”

The Hall Of Fame’s laissez-faire conventions mostly mean that nominees can win an award based on how nice they are to the people who vote for them, and they regularly schmooze with the reporters and writers who make up the BBWAA in order to score bro levels. For pattern, Woody Paige( Denver plays columnist and regular ESPN panelist) has been good friends with former Yankee Goose Gossage since the ‘7 0s and has even said that he “would vote for him even if he wasn’t deserving. I like vote in favour of friends.” Paige has also admitted that he “always votes for Rockies, ” his hometown team.

Although in his protection, that might just be out of sadnes .

Of course, the bayonet cuts both paths. If the voters don’t like you personally, you can say goodbye to that Hall Of Fame nomination. And regrettably, due to shitty human nature, that often comes down to the melanin content of your skin. A 1999 empirical contemplate carried out within Mount Holyoke College concluded that the Hall Of Fame has a strong voting bias against non-white players, while at the same meter, even known cheaters can get a target in the Hall if they cozy up enough with voters. Pitcher Gaylord Perry acknowledged to doctoring baseballs in 1974, and then obstructed playing for years after. He had no problem getting into the Hall in 1991. And Ty Cobb won his plaza in the Hall after years of being known as a prejudiced and a possible assassin and a stint of clambering into the stands to beat the shit out of a guy with no handwritings.( To clarify that sentence, it was the main victims who had no hands. Cobb’s hands were intact, which substantiated priceless in both baseball and perforating .)

# 3. Corporate Honors Have Zero Oversight

Businesses adoration corporate honors for obvious rationales. But, how did a company such as Comcast, which is consistently involved as one of the most disliked corporations in the known universe, earn dozens of these types of awards in 2014?

Industry joinings ?

Researchers at the University Of Massachusetts Amherst analyse prestigious bestows such as Fortune magazine’s “1 00 Best Companionship To Run For” and found that most of the accolades are conceded alone on the basis of data provided by the company. For analogy, imagine if the Oscars were apportioned only on the basis of how much board of directors likes his own movie.

On top of that, much of the data that is gathered for nominations such as “most ethical company” and “most LGBT-friendly company” were sourced from workplace examines that are frequently not anonymous. If your bos hands you a examination about whether or not you think they’re a bunch of sociopathic, prejudiced, and homophobic assholes, and the first question it expects is your call and outlook, integrity is not a priority.

“It seems everyone enjoys our firm except the 27 employees appointed John Doe.”

More damning, the honors are often given out by consulting firms, which may seem like a conflict of interest since these conglomerates often wind up doing consulting work for these same companies.

TL ;D R: That’s why Comcast is the best!

# 2. Flesh Skating Is The Most Corrupted Happen In The Olympics

Don’t be misled by how silly it appears — figure skating is one of the most physically expecting happenings in the Olympics, and joining the team, let alone prevailing a honour, requires years of training and train as well as the ability to look serious in a sequined unitard. And all of that matters not in the slightest, since person skating is more rigged than the Zimbabwe presidential election.

Which is how Sasha Cohen briefly became its President in 2009.

In 1998, Ukrainian reviewer Yuri Balkov was caught trying to fix the race. You would probably assume that he would be banned from the Olympics, but , no: He was exclusively hung. For one year . Which doesn’t matter much when you’re talking about an occasion that currently exists every four times. Yep, “hes been gone” right back to the judge’s chair in 2002.

As far as anyone knows, he played it straight this time, but that doesn’t mean other adjudicates didn’t gather up the corruption baton. In 2014, Russia and the United States were accused of attempting to rig multiple happenings in their favor by voting in favour of one another. But, hey, at least the Russians and Americans are going along for a change. Isn’t world peace worth the soundnes of an ice-dancing tournament?

Though if the respective chairmen ever want to settle their beeves with a skate-dance off, we’re utterly behind the idea .

# 1. The Nobel Prize Does Not Recognize Women

There’s probably no more prestigious give in existence than the Nobel Prize. Spanning multiple fields of scientific and cultural accomplishment, getting a Nobel prize winner is like pulsating the final boss in the game of life. And, at the least in the technical environments, they are able to pretty much forget about it if you have a vagina.

At least they haven’t started handing dames pink Nobelle Prizes .

The Nobel Committee has gone to some pretty great lengths throughout biography to avoid returning discipline apportions to ladies, even if they are responsible for the actual science that was awarded. In 1957, Chien-Shiung Wu detected beta rot, but they imparted the award to the two dudes who theorized its existence. In 1962, Rosalind Franklin was part of a squad who helped confirm the structure of DNA, and the Committee returned the award to her male colleagues.

Most famously, in 1974, astronomer Jocelyn Bell Burnell discovered pulsars and acquired the error of telling her thesis advisor Antony Hewish, who was immediately apportioned the Nobel Prize for being A Man Who Heard About A Big Discovery His Student Made.

“I would like to thank my penis for making this possible and for just generally being cool.”

Of course, these specimen are all from a few decades ago when you basically draw all of society being like Mad Men , so it probably doesn’t surprised to see me. But even in more recent years, out of 862 accolades handed out, exclusively 43 of them have been to women.

On a most positive observe, things are beginning to change. The happening is that today’s discipline bestows are often handed out to people who have been meticulously researching their subject for half a century, so when the Committee sides out an apportion, it’s typically for a project that started in a hour when women genuinely were dissuaded from studying science in favor of studying the biological makeup of a sandwich. Therefore, we can’t truly suggest it’s biased, so much as it still indicates the biases from the time of the Cold War. That’s technically better, right?

Like it.? Share it:
Tags:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.